A Critical Review: The Papua New Guinea Defense White Paper (2013)
By Zola Yinanguie
Introduction
The Defence White Paper
(DWP) is a comprehensive document that outlines Papua New Guinea’s strategic defence
policies and objectives, offering direction for the growth of the PNG Defence
Organization (PNGDO) to achieve our national security goals. The DWP 2013
aligns closely with the National Security Policy (NSP). The PNGDO’s main
operation focus is based on four tasks: Defend Papua New Guinea, Civil
Emergency Assistance, National Building, and International Obligations. In this
policy review, I intend to provide a mixed response on the DWP 2013.
Summary
The DWP is
well-structured and includes acknowledgements by prominent figures such as
former Prime Minister Peter O’Neil, former Minister of Defence Dr. Fabian Pok,
former Chief Secretary Manasupe Zurenoc, and supporting statements by former
Commander of PNGDF Brigadier General Francis Agwi and former Secretary for
Defence John Sini Porti.
Developed through wide
consultation and guided by the National Security Policy Technical Working Group
(NSPTWG), the policy links PNG Vision 2050, development and security, the National
Security Policy, and PNG’s strategic defence interests. It emphasizes defending
PNG’s sovereignty and the integrity of its land, air, and maritime borders, and
outlines the defence force’s roles in engineering, health, and communication.
Additionally, the policy
seeks to increase PNG’s participation in bilateral and multilateral forums and
UN peacekeeping efforts. By focusing on these areas, the Defence White Paper
aims to ensure a secure and prosperous future for Papua New Guinea.
Critique
In 2017, an article
published on online platform stated that PNG’s DWP has terribly failed to
achieve any of its objectives. While the DWP outlines PNG’s strategic defence
policies and objectives, there are several strengths and weaknesses that have
been identified and will be evaluated in this section.
The DWP outlines numerous
tasks and goals, however, its implementation has faced significant challenges.
It was released in 2013, by 2017, almost 138 of the 258 tasks identified in the
White Paper were implemented, defence spending remained at 2% of the government
expenditure due to economic constraints (Kaiku & Boie, 2023). Another
example, in 2017, the PNGDF did not reach its target of 5000 soldiers as stated
in the DWO, as the PNGDF were financially constrained, this did not allow them
the capacity to cater for a larger number of intakes (Teme, 2017). The DWP does
not fully address economic limitations, which could hinder achieving its
targets. While it provides strategic guidance, it needs a more detailed
implementation roadmap, including timeliness, resource allocation, and clear
responsibilities.
Additionally, an effective monitoring and evaluation framework is necessary to track progress and make adjustments, ensuring objectives are met and allowing for timely interventions. In an article titled Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector, it states that monitoring and evaluation is essential in the public sector as it enables accountability, evidence-based decision-making, learning and improvement, transparency and communication, and effective resource allocation. The PNGDF has experienced several budget cuts in the middle of the fiscal year because a proper plan of execution and accountability to funds allocated was not provided. Hence, several reforms have been undertaken in the past two years to help drive accountability and transparency in finance and administration. The PNGDF will introduce the IMFS System in the department’s finances, and a project steering committee will oversee all projects whilst working alongside the Australian Defence Force (The National, 2019).
Institutions of national security have been ineffective due to the lack of effective coordination and implementation since independence (National Security Policy, 2013). In an interview
with PNG News, PNGDF Commander Major General Mark Gonia, noted that the
delivery of a new defence white paper did not occur as planned, citing a lack
of commitment from the government and organizational challenges within the
PNGDF. He emphasized his intentions to reset the force, focusing on five lines
of effort, namely, people, organizational reform, operational proficiency,
infrastructure and nation building (PNG News Update, 2023).
The DWP emphasizes the
role of the defence force in various capacities but could further elaborate on
the strategies for human resource development, including training, retaining
service members, and capacity building. The five lines of effort would involve
investing in the growth and development of PNGDF personnel, implementing
organizational reforms to improve efficiency and effectiveness, enhancing
operational proficiency through training and equipment modernization, upgrading
infrastructure to support PNGDF operations, and contributing to nation-building
efforts in Papua New Guinea.
A politicized military
may prioritize political agendas over security concerns, leading to corruption
and the PNGDF’s ability to respond effectively to threats. A recent article published
by The National online, covered the appointment of the Chief of PNGDF, Rear
Admiral Philip Polyewara, and Deputy Chief of Defence, Brigadier General Larry
Opa. Defence Minister Dr. Billy Joseph stated that the appointments were made
to stabilize PNGDF leadership and motivate progress work on the DWP and review the
Defence Act (Poivi, 2024). As describe in the same article, the Defence
Commanders were selected upon merit, hence, their appointment and
implementation of policies should ensure the stability and encourage growth within
the PNGDO.
Recommendations
1. Provide a detailed series of steps to be carried out or implemented, in areas of timeliness, resource allocation and clear responsibilities or roles of parties involved.
2. An effective monitoring and evaluation framework is necessary to track progress and make adjustments, ensuring objectives are met and allowing for timely response.
3. Include objectives highlighted in the five lines of effort in an updated policy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the
DWP sets a strategic vision for PNG’s defence, its success centers on
addressing economic constraints, providing a detailed implementation roadmap,
and establishing a strong monitoring and evaluation framework to ensure
effective execution and adaptation to emerging challenges. Additionally,
fostering strong leadership and organizational commitment is crucial for
achieving the outlined objectives.
References
Defence
White Paper, Papua New Guinea. (2013). Defence
White Paper 2013. Port Moresby: Government of Papua New Guinea.
Kaiku,
P. & Boie, F.H. (2023, December 22). Why
did ONG sign a Defence Cooperation Agreement with the US?. The Interpreter.
The Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/why-did-png-sign-defence-cooperation-agreement-us
National
Security Policy, Papua New Guinea. (2013). National
Security Policy 2013. Port Moresby: Government of Papua New Guinea.
Post
Courier. (2017, December 13). PNG’s
embarrassing failed Defence White Paper. https://www.postcourier.com.pg/pngs-embarrassing-failed-defence-white-paper/
Eval
Community. (n.d.). Monitoring and
evaluation in the public sector: Key components, principles and examples.
Monitoring
and Evaluation in the Public Sector: Key Components, Principles and Examples -
EvalCommunity EvalCommunity
Poivi,
A. (2024, June 14). PNGDF chief notes
issues. The National. https://www.thenational.com.pg/pngdf-chief-notes-issues/
Teme,
K. (2017, June 27). PNGDF unable to meet
target. Post Courier. https://www.postcourier.com.pg/pngdf-unable-to-meet-target/
The National. (2019, January 16). Accountability key priority for PNGDF. The National. https://www.thenational.com.pg/accountability-key-priority-for-pngdf/
Great article but the recommendations although three or four could have been elaborated upon or deepened. I believe that the PNGDF White Paper of 2013 should have included a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. The Department of National Planning & Monitoring could have assisted in providing a DNPM Monitoring & Evaluation Framework that should be closely aligned to the PNG National Responsibility Act of 2016. The Corporate Service & Compliance Division of the PNG Department of National Planning & Monitoring particularly its Project Audit, Internal Audit, Social Audit inclusive of Gender Audit Team would have been able to assist the PNGDF White Paper 2013 Drifting Committee prior to the Finalizing and Launching of the PNGDF White Paper of 2013.
ReplyDelete